News aus Amerika
ist in der Wissenschaft zur Regel geworden, dass amerikanische
Studien größeres Ansehen geniessen, als die, die
in anderen Ländern dieser Welt verfasst wurden.
Jede Form kritikloser Akzeptanz ist jedoch mit der Möglichkeit
behaftet, dass aus diesem Land unbegrenzter Möglichkeiten
auch ein sog "hoax" die Wissenschft hier zum Narren
Kritisch wird es, wenn aus Amerika neueste Erkenntnise von
einen hoax berichten, auf den die Wissenschaft dort hereingefallen
ist - da bleibt nur die Frage: wem dient dies - qui bono...
würden wir hämisch lächeld zur Tagesordnung
übergehen - doch dies hier verdient unsere Beachtung,
da es hier um unser höchstes Gut geht: die Gesundheit.
also doch etwas dran? Könnte es sein, dass die Wahrheit
sich in der Wissenschaft erst durch eine doppelte Verneinung
zeigt - viel Ehre bringt man hier ja der "Doppelt-Blind-Studie"
Wer sieht eigentlich noch wo es hier weiter geht?
Den Text gebe ich aus Autentizitätsgründen im Original
wieder - mit Quelle versteht sich - sprachliche Feinheiten
ermöglichen eine bessere Abwägung der Glaubhaftigkeit...
und erhöhen vielleicht die Autorität...
der Weisheit: "Gesundheit ist nicht eine Frage des Geldes
- sie ist eine Frage des Wissens", möge das hier
angefügte tief, tief unter die Haut gehen!!!
Dieses Wissen kann hier sogar Leben retten!
Ende des Textes befindet sich eine kurze Zusammenfassung in
The Great HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed
NaturalNews Special Report
by Mike Adams
For the last several years, HPV vaccines have been marketed
to the public and mandated in compulsory injections for young
girls in several states based on the idea that they prevent
cervical cancer. Now, NaturalNews has obtained documents from
the FDA and other sources (see below) which reveal that the
FDA has been well aware for several years that Human Papilloma
Virus (HPV) has no direct link to cervical cancer.
has also learned that HPV vaccines have been proven to be
flatly worthless in clearing the HPV virus from women who
have already been exposed to HPV (which includes most sexually
active women), calling into question the scientific justification
of mandatory "vaccinate everyone" policies.
this story reveals evidence that the vaccine currently being
administered for HPV - Gardasil - may increase the
risk of precancerous cervical lesions by an alarming 44.6
percent in some women. The vaccine, it turns out,
may be far more dangerous to the health of women than doing
nothing at all.
true, this information reveals details of an enormous public
health fraud being perpetrated on the American people, involving
FDA officials, Big Pharma promoters, and even the governors
of states like Texas. The health and safety of tens of millions
of young girls is at stake here, and what this NaturalNews
investigative report reveals is that HPV vaccinations
may not only be medically useless; they may also be harmful
to the health of the young girls receiving them.
(Impfungen gegen HPV-Viren sind nicht nur medizinisch ohne
Nutzen - sie können sogar eine Gefahr für die Gesundheit
der jungen Frauen sein, die sie bekommen.)
report reveals startling facts about the HPV vaccine that
most people will find shocking:
How it may actually increase the risk of precancerous lesions
by 44.6 percent.
The FDA has, for four years, known that HPV was not the cause
of cervical cancer.
Why mandatory HPV vaccination policies may cause great harm
to young girls.
Why HPV infections are self-limiting and pose no real danger
in healthy women
Little-known FDA documents that reveal astounding facts about
How Big Pharma promoted its Gardasil vaccine using disease
mongering and fear mongering
The Trail of Evidence
story begins at a company called HiFi DNA Tech, LLC (http://www.hifidna.com)
a company involved in the manufacture of portable HPV testing
devices based on DNA sequencing analysis. HiFi DNA Tech has
been pushing to get the FDA to classify its HPV detection
technology as a "Class II" virology testing device.
To understand why this is a big deal, you have to understand
the differences between "Class II" and "Class
III" virology testing devices.
on FDA rules, a Class III virology testing device is one that
is considered by the FDA to have "premarket approval,"
meaning that it cannot yet be sold to the public. In order
for such a device to be marketed to the public, it must be
downgraded to Class II status, which is considered a "special
controls" status. Class II devices are, "...those
devices for which the general controls by themselves are insufficient
to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but for which there is sufficient information to establish
special controls to provide such assurance, including performance
standards, postmarket surveillance, patient registries, development
and dissemination of guidelines, recommendations, and any
other appropriate actions the agency deems necessary."
other words, a Class II device may or may not actually be
safe, but the FDA considers is safe enough to release to the
DNA Tech has been trying to get its HPV detection device downgraded
to a Class II device based on the following arguments:
For more than 20 years, the FDA had regulated the HPV test
as a "test for cervical cancer."
But since at least 2003, the FDA has changed its position
on the relationship between Human Papilloma Virus and cervical
cancer, stating that the HPV strain is "not associated
with cervical cancer."
Accordingly, HiFi DNA Tech is arguing that the HPV test it
has developed is no longer a test for cervical cancer,
but is merely a test for the presence of Human Papilloma Viruses
-- a shift that makes the test far more reliable in its primary
purpose. In other words, the test is merely detecting the
presence of a virus, not making a diagnosis of a disease (which
would be a much higher standard to meet).
October 12, 2007, HiFi DNA Tech sued the Food and Drug Administration
in an attempt to force it to downgrade its HPV detection technology
to Class II (see http://www.news-medical.net/?id=31180
). Earlier in the year -- on March 7, 2007, HiFi DNA Tech
filed the HPV PCR test reclassification petition with the
FDA. It is the information in this petition document
that led us to the FDA's knowledge that HPV is not linked
to cervical cancer.
all that? This is a somewhat complex story to follow, so here
it is again in summary:
A company that manufacturers a DNA testing device that can
detect the presence of HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) is petitioning
the FDA (and suing the FDA) to get it to reclassify its medical
device as a "Class II" device based on the revelation
that the FDA has already adopted the position that HPV infections
do not directly cause cervical cancer.
This would mean that the FDA has been aware for years
that HPV does not cause cervical cancer, which means
that the FDA's approval of the Gardasil vaccine -- as well
as the national push for Gardasil vaccinations -- is based
on a grand medical hoax that, not surprisingly, appears to
be designed to exploit the fear of cancer to sell vaccines.
The victims in all this, of course, are the young girls who
are apparently being subjected to a medically useless (and
potentially dangerous) vaccine.
None of this information was apparently known during the more
recent debates over the safety and efficacy of Gardasil, the
HPV vaccine now in use. This means that the public debate
over mandatory HPV vaccinations lacked key elements that now
seem essential to reaching rational, evidence-based conclusions
over the safety and efficacy of such vaccines.
we reveal the FDA's statement that HPV is "not associated
with cervical cancer."
The Text of the Petition
The Reclassification Petition, dated March 7, 2007, is still
posted on the FDA's website: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/07p0210/07p-0210-ccp0001-01-vol1.pdf
case the FDA removes this document (as it has been known to
do), we've posted a backup copy of the document on our own
document reveals the following text:
FDA news release of March 31, 2003 acknowledges that "most
infections (by HPV) are short-lived and not associated with
cervical cancer", in recognition of the advances in medical
science and technology since 1988. In other words, since 2003
the scientific staff of the FDA no longer considers HPV infection
to be a high-risk disease when writing educational materials
for the general public whereas the regulatory arm of the agency
is still bound by the old classification scheme that had placed
HPV test as a test to stratify risk for cervical cancer in
regulating the industry.
sought to verify the existence of the FDA news release referenced
by this petition reclassification document and found that,
indeed, the FDA news release exists.
it, the FDA says, "The HPV DNA test is not intended to
substitute for regular Pap screening. Nor is it intended to
screen women under 30 who have normal Pap tests. Although
the rate of HPV infection in this group is high, most
infections are short-lived and not associated with cervical
cancer." (Emphasis added.)
other words, the FDA knew in 2003 that HPV infections are
not associated with cervical cancer.(Der
amerikanischen Gesundheitsbehörde FDA ist seit 2003 bekannt,
dass HPV-Infektionen nicht die Ursache für Gebärmutterhalöskrebs
the FDA states, in the same press release, "Most women
who become infected with HPV are able to eradicate the virus
and suffer no apparent long-term consequences to their health."
other words, HPV infections do not cause cervical
cancer! Remember, the entire push for mandatory HPV
vaccinations of young girls across the country has been the
urgent call to "save" these young girls from cervical
cancer. The vaccine push has been about "savings lives."
But as these documents clearly reveal, HPV is no threat to
the lives of young girls. In fact, as you will see below,
HPV infections are naturally self-limiting!
HPV Infections Resolve Themselves, Without Vaccines
the reclassification petition reveals, HPV infections are
naturally self-limiting -- meaning that they are controlled
naturally, without requiring intervention with drugs or vaccines.
It is not the HPV virus itself that causes cervical cancer
but rather a persistent state of ill-health on the part of
the patient that makes her vulnerable to persistent infections.
the petition states:
on new scientific information published in the past 15 years,
it is now generally agreed that identifying and typing HPV
infection does not bear a direct relationship to stratification
of the risk for cervical cancer . Most acute infections caused
by HPV are self-limiting [1, 4-7]. ...Repeated sequential
transient HPV infections, even when caused by "high-risk"
HPVs, are characteristically not associated with high risk
of developing squamous intraepithelial lesions, a precursor
of cervical cancer.
woman found to be positive for the same strain (genotype)
of HPV on repeated testing is highly likely suffering from
a persistent HPV infection and is considered to be at high
risk of developing precancerous intraepithelial lesions in
the cervix . It is the persistent infection, not the virus,
that determines the cancer risk."
FDA agrees with this assessment of the relationship between
HPV and cervical cancer, as evidenced by its 2003 news release
we reveal evidence that HPV vaccines actually cause precancerous
lesions in women.
Do HPV Vaccines Increase the Risk of Precancerous Lesions?
The reclassification petition cited above also reveals that
Gardasil vaccines may increase the risk of developing precancerous
lesions by 44.6 percent in some groups of women. This is found
in a quote referencing a document mentioned in the petition,
HPV detection device with provision for accurate HPV genotyping
is more urgently needed now because vaccination with Gardasil
of the women who are already sero-positive and PCR-positive
for vaccine-relevant genotypes of HPV has been found to increase
the risk of developing high-grade precancerous lesions by
44.6%, according to an FDA VRBPAC Background Document : Gardasil
HPV Quadrivalent Vaccine. May 18, 2006 VRBPAC Meeting. www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/briefing/2006-4222B3.pdf
tracked down the correct URL of the document referenced above
and found it in the FDA docket archives. We have placed a
safe backup copy at: http://www.NaturalNews.com/downloads/FDA-Gardasil.pdf
enough, this document reveals startling information about
the extreme dangers apparently posed by Gardasil vaccinations.
On page 13, this document states:
Regarding Primary Endpoint Analyses among Subgroups
were two important concerns that were identified during the
course of the efficacy review of this BLA. One was the potential
for Gardasil to enhance disease among a subgroup of subjects
who had evidence of persistent infection with vaccine-relevant
HPV types at baseline. The other concern was the observations
of CIN 2/3 or worse cases due to HPV types not contained in
the vaccine. These cases of disease due to other HPV types
have the potential to counter the efficacy results of Gardasil
for the HPV types contained in the vaccine.
Evaluation of the potential of Gardasil™ to enhance
cervical disease in subjects who had evidence of persistent
infection with vaccine-relevant HPV types prior to vaccination.
The results of exploratory subgroup analyses for study 013
suggested a concern that subjects who were seropositive and
PCR-positive for the vaccine-relevant HPV types had a greater
number of CIN 2/3 or worse cases as demonstrated in the following
appeared that subjects in this subgroup of study 013 who received
Gardasil™ might have had enhanced risk factors for development
of CIN 2/3 or worse compared to placebo recipients."
Revealing the Dangers of Gardasil
revelation should be quite shocking to anyone who has been
following the debate over Gardasil and mandatory vaccinations
of teenage girls. First, it reveals that Gardasil
appears to increase disease by 44.6 percent in certain people
-- namely, those who were already carriers of the same HPV
strains used in the vaccine.
other words, it appears that if the vaccine is given
to a young woman who already carries HPV in a "harmless"
state, it may "activate" the infection and directly
cause precancerous lesions to appear. The vaccine,
in other words, may accelerate the development of precancerous
lesions in women.
is information that has simply not been made available in
the debate over Gardasil vaccination policies. The pro-vaccination
rhetoric has always been about "saving lives" and
it carried the implied statement that Gardasil is perfectly
safe for all women, posing absolutely no increased risk of
cancer. What these documents reveal, however, is that Gardasil
may, in fact, pose a serious increase in the risk of cervical
cancer in some recipients of the vaccine.
Will health authorities "interrogate" young virgins
over their sexual activity (or lack thereof)? What are the
bioethical ramifications of this vaccine being mandated to
all teenage girls?
Interrogating Young Virgins
FDA directly admits the vaccine is utterly useless in these
women, stating in the same document, "Finally, there
is compelling evidence that the vaccine lacks therapeutic
efficacy among women who have had prior exposure to HPV and
have not cleared previous infection (PCR positive and seropositive)."
this essentially means is that the "safe" administering
of the Gardasil vaccine requires that it be administered
only to virgins (because virtually all women who
are sexually active carry HPV strains). That, of course, would
require the direct questioning of the sexual habits of all
young girls before administering the vaccine.
this what the Governor of Texas really had in mind when he
mandated such vaccinations for all young girls in Texas? ...
a male doctor with a vaccination needle in his hand and a
thirteen-year-old girl sitting in a private clinic room behind
closed doors, with the male doctor asking her, "Have
you ever had sex?"
this kind of patient questioning crosses all kinds of ethical
barriers when such vaccinations are made mandatory
(as they have been made in Texas). It puts the State in the
positioning of ascertaining the sexual habits of very young
teenage girls and then potentially causing them harm. It's
not hard to suppose that most sexually active teenage girls
would claim to still be virgins (especially if their parents
were present), creating a situation where vaccines would be
routinely administered to precisely the HPV carrier subgroups
for which it has been demonstrated to greatly increase the
risk of precancerous lesions.
other words, under a mandatory Gardasil vaccination scenario
like what exists in Texas today, a sexually-active young teenage
girl has to make a tough choice:
She can lie to her doctor, claim to be a virgin, receive the
vaccine and thereby potentially increase her risk of cervical
She can tell her doctor she's sexually active, thereby surrendering
her privacy and possibly subjecting herself to various consequences
from her sexual status being learned by her parents or guardians.
(One would hope, of course, that such sexual habits were not
secrets, but alas, we live in the real world where many teenage
girls do indeed have sex at a very early age...)
the young girl is unlikely to be given accurate information
about the health risks associated with the vaccine, since
virtually all health authorities are heavily involved in promoting
pro-vaccination propaganda, routinely ignoring scientific
evidence that might give reasonable people pause.
the better scenario here is that the young girl is not sexually
active to begin with, but in a society where 8th and 9th graders
are already routinely engaged in sexual activities -- almost
always unbeknownst to their parents -- it seems naive to expect
that such girls would suddenly honor pledges of celibacy in
order to protect themselves from possible future dangers posed
by a present-day vaccine (especially when doctors blindly
claim the vaccine is harmless).
are also serious questions about the safety of the vaccine
for non-sexually-active young women. Yet even if the vaccine
poses no increased risk of cervical cancer for non-sexually-active
young girls, there's still the more serious question of: Does
the vaccine work? Does it really prevent cervical cancer in
the first place? And that question has already been clearly
answered by the FDA's own admission that HPV infections are
not the cause of cervical cancer in the first place.
Do HPV vaccinations help anyone? We reveal a four-quadrant
comparison that shows the vaccine to be more harmful than
The Four Quadrants of Garsadil Vaccinations
considering the safety and effectiveness of Gardasil vaccinations
on young teens, there are essentially four quadrants to consider,
as shown in the table below:
Quadrant I: Non-Sexually ActiveNo Gardasil Vaccine
Quadrant II: Non-Sexually ActiveReceives Gardasil
Quadrant III: Sexually ActiveNo Gardasil Vaccine
Quadrant IV: Sexually ActiveReceives Gardasil Vaccine
Based on what we've learned from the FDA's own documents,
here are the likely outcomes of each of the four quadrants:
I: Non-Sexually Active, No Gardasil Vaccine
Outcome: No risk of cervical cancer.
II: Non-Sexually Active, Receives Gardasil Vaccine
Outcome: No medical benefit from vaccine.
III: Sexually Active, No Gardasil Vaccine
Outcome: HPV presence is self-limiting and does not lead to
IV: Sexually Active, Receives Gardasil Vaccine
Outcome: 44.6% Increased risk of precancerous lesions. No
reduction in cancer risk.
other words, Gardasil adds no benefits
to any quadrant! There is no subgroup that
actually benefits from a Gardasil vaccination. But there is
at least one quadrant in which Gardasil achieves an increased
risk of disease. Put another way, Gardasil helps no one, but
it harms some.
is hardly a position from which to mandate the vaccine for
everyone, especially since the vaccine has been widely prescribed
as "completely safe" for everyone. It is widely
claimed by medical authorities that the vaccine has no downside:
No health risks, no increased risk of disease and no potential
to cause harm in women. Clearly, these assumptions have no
basis in scientific fact.
in mind, too, that Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil, has
publicly suggested that young boys should receive Gardasil
vaccinations! Why? Because they might engage in oral sex with
girls who carry the virus. Therefore, the story goes, young
boys should be vaccinated against this virus that they claim
causes cervical cancer! (Never mind the fact that boys don't
have a cervix...) There is no end, it seems, to the pseudoscientific
nonsense that will be spouted in an effort to sell more Garsasil
vaccines to people who don't need them.
New clinical study shows Gardasil to be medically useless.
Research Shows Gardasil to be Useless
further investigate this conclusion, NaturalNews took a closer
look at research published in the Journal of the American
Medical Association (August, 2007), entitled, "Effect
of Human Papillomavirus 16/18 L1 Viruslike Particle Vaccine
Among Young Women With Preexisting Infection"
research sought to determine the usefulness of the HPV vaccine
among women who already carry HPV (which includes virtually
all women who are sexually active, regardless of their age).
document can currently be found at a University of Louisville
document archive reprinted from JAMA.
in case that copy disappears, we've also hosted the PDF here:
document reveals startling information about the ineffectiveness
of the Gardasil vaccine. It reveals that the HPV vaccine
often caused an increase in the presence of HPV strains
while utterly failing to clear the viruses in most women.
shocking results caused the study authors to publish this
sobering conclusion, printed in JAMA:
significant evidence of a vaccine therapeutic effect was observed
in analyses restricted to women who received all doses of
vaccine or those with evidence of single HPV infections at
entry (Table2). We observed no evidence of vaccine effects
when we stratified the analysis on selected study entry characteristics
reflective of [various parameters] (TABLE3). Similarly, no
evidence of vaccine effects was observed in analyses stratified
by other study entry parameters thought to potentially influence
clearance rates and efficacy of the vaccine, including time
since sexual initiation, oral contraceptive use, cigarette
smoking, and concomitant infection with C trachomatis or N
gonorrhoeae (Table 3)."
other words, the authors found no evidence that the vaccine
worked at all. This observation led the authors to offer this
damning conclusion that appears to render Gardasil nothing
more than a grand medical hoax:
rates of viral clearance over a 12-month period are not influenced
study goes on to state words that should cause every doctor,
Governor and health authority across the United States (and
around the world) to rethink Gardasil vaccination policies:
that viral clearance rates did not differ by treatment group
and that persistent viral infection is the best established
predictor of risk of progression, it is unlikely that vaccination
could have a significant beneficial impact on rate of lesion
from our community-based study provide strong evidence that
there is little, if any, therapeutic benefit from the vaccine
in the population we studied. Furthermore, we see no reason
to believe that there is therapeutic benefit of the vaccine
elsewhere because the biological effect of vaccination among
already infected women is not expected to vary by population.
other words, the vaccines didn't work on the population studied,
and there is no reason to believe that those same vaccines
would magically work on other populations, since the biology
of women and HPV is so similar across various populations.
Is Gardasil a grand medical hoax?
The Conclusion: HPV Vaccinations a Medical Hoax
is difficult to take an honest look at this scientific evidence
and the statements made by the FDA and not come to the conclusion
that mandatory Gardasil vaccination policies being pushed
across U.S. states right now are based on something other
are many theories exploring the motivation for such vaccination
policies. Possible theories include:
benefit: Big Pharma is pushing mandatory Gardasil
vaccination policies so that it can profit from selling more
vaccines to the states. This idea is at least partially supported
by the fact that the first state Governor to mandate such
vaccines (Texas Gov. Rick Perry) had undisclosed ties to Big
Pharma. (A top official in Perry's administration worked directly
for Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil.)
to poison the people: This theory, which may stretch
the bounds of belief in some readers, proposes that such mandatory
vaccines are put in place in order to create future disease
by poisoning the people with dangerous chemicals and DNA fragments
that are knowingly added to vaccines. The poisoning of the
people, it is said, will pay off in future profits for Big
Pharma when those people develop other serious diseases requiring
"treatment" with medications. Many people who support
this theory currently believe, for example, that AIDS was
engineered by human scientists and then administered to the
gay population in New York in the late 1980's through vaccines.
the sheeple: This theory supposes that the main purpose
of mandatory vaccines is to train the American public to get
used to submitting to compulsory medicines. Once a certain
segment of the population is targeted and effectively injected
with mandatory medicines, these policies can be extended to
other groups and, eventually, can encompass the entire population.
first theory -- Financial Benefit -- is the simplest and easiest
theory to believe. It requires nothing more than simple greed
on the part of Big Pharma, along with the usual level of corruption
at the FDA. NaturalNews believes this is the most likely explanation
for events surrounding Gardasil vaccination policies, but
we do not rule out other possible explanations, either.
Profits at Any Cost
clear in all this is that mandatory HPV vaccination programs
are not based on anything resembling good science. They seem
to be based on a carefully planted meme -- an idea that, coincidentally,
spreads from one person's mind to the next much like a virus,
gaining momentum as the mainstream media (MSM), health authorities,
FDA and drug company reps repeat the meme on a regular basis.
And what is that meme? That HPV causes cervical cancer, and,
therefore, HPV vaccinations could halt cervical cancer and
meme appears to have no real scientific basis. It is more
of an urban legend than anything resembling scientific fact.
Furthermore, it appears to have been conjured by those in
a position to financially benefit from the adoption of that
meme (the drug companies who manufacture, sell, and profit
from the sale of HPV vaccines). In this case, that drug company
is Merck, a powerful corporation with a dubious history rife
with charges of price fixing, large-scale tax avoidance (it
set up offshore accounts to avoid billions in U.S. taxes),
widespread biopiracy, conspiring with the FDA to discredit
its critics, burying negative evidence about its drugs (see
the history of Vioxx at www.NaturalNews.com/vioxx.html
) and numerous other actions that many consider to be criminal
is no question that Merck has the lack of ethics, the willingness
and the means to commit medical fraud on an unprecedented
scale. Based on the information revealed in this report, the
mandatory vaccination of young girls with Gardasil appears
to be the boldest medical hoax yet perpetrated by the company.
You can read the true history about Merck and its crimes at:
believes Merck is currently engaged in a massive medical fraud,
and that it has influenced, corrupted or otherwise recruited
FDA officials and state health authorities in a grand scheme
to sell vaccines that are at best medically worthless, and
at worst medically dangerous. Halting cervical cancer seems
to have nothing to do with the marketing and prescribing of
Gardasil. The entire campaign push for mandatory HPV vaccinations
seems to be based entirely in the realm of sales and marketing.
"marketing" of HPV vaccines involves classic disease
mongering -- spreading fear about a disease as a way of corralling
patients into begging for the "solution" that just
happens to be readily available from the same pharmaceutical
company that promoted the disease in the first place. The
hype over cervical cancer and Gardasil seems to be nothing
more than a classic case of fear-based marketing designed
to create such consumer fear over cervical cancer that a massive
public outcry would result in legislation mandating the vaccines.
share this article with others. (Bitte diese Artikel
is granted to reprint this article in its entirety, for any
non-commercial purpose, as long as full credit is given to
the author (Mike Adams) and a clearly visible clickable link
is placed back to this URL at NaturalNews.com. You may also
freely quote from this article with proper citation.
DNA Tech files lawsuit against FDA
Petition - Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA Nested Polymerase
Chain Reaction (PCR) Detection Device (K063649 )
Background Document, Gardasil™ HPV Quadrivalent
Vaccine, May 18, 2006 VRBPAC Meeting
of Human Papillomavirus 16/18 L1 Viruslike Particle Vaccine
Among Young Women With Preexisting Infection
Journal of the American Medical Association, August, 2007
Kurze zusammenfassende Übersetzung
die von mir vorgenommene auszugsweise Übertragung ins
Deutsche Fehler aufweist, bitte ich diese zu entschuldigen
oder mir einen korrigierten Text per eMail zukommen zu lassen.
Ergebnis umfangreicher Recherchen von NaturalNews hat ergeben:
- HPV (Herpes Papilloma Virus) konnte bisher nicht als Ursache
für Gebärmutterhalskrebs nachgewiesen werden.
2. - HPV - Impfungen sind nicht nur medizinisch völlig
wertlos, sie befreien niemanden von HP Viren, die vielleicht
schon im Körper sind, sie können sogar die Entstehung
steht ausser Zweifel, dass eine HPV-Impfung wissenschaftlich
NICHT vertretbar ist.
hat sich sogar gezeigt, dass der HPV-Impfstoff Gardasil, das
Risiko an Gebärmutterhalskrebs zu erkranken, um bis zu
44,6 % erhöhen kann.
D.h. die Impfung ist viel gefährlicher ist, als wenn
man bei einer HPV-Infektion nichts tut.
HPV-Viren überhaupt keinen Gebärmutterhalskrebs
auslösen ist der FDA (Amerikanisches Gesundheitsamt)
seit 2003 bekannt, dennoch werden die Tatsachen ignoriert
und Werbung für die Inpfung in USA und Europa gemacht.
( Warum? Funktionierte die SARS-Rinderwahn-Vogelgrippe-Hysterisierung
nicht? Blieb der erwartete Profit aus?)
junge Frauen den Impfstoff Gardasil erhalten, nachdem sie
schon mit HPV in Kontakt gekommen sind - das sind fast alle
Frauen, die Geschlechtsverkehr hatten - dann besteht sogar
die Gefahr, die harmlose HPV-Infektion so zu aktivieren, dass
Zellen am Muttermund entarten und sich eine Krabsvorstufe
herausbildet - nachweisbar im zytologischebn Abstrich.
Im Klartext heisst das: gibt ein Mädchen vor, noch Jungfrau
zu sein, wird sie durch eine Impfung mit Gardasil potentiell
der erhöhten Gefahr ausgesetzt an einem Gebärmutterhalskrebs
Da wirkt die Aufklärung
hier wie purer Zynismus. Wer jedoch trotzdem die Impfung
durchführen will, dem sei aus versicherungsrechtlichen
Gesichtspunkten dringend angeraten diese
Bescheinigung auszudrucken und vorab vom Arzt unterschreiben
man es dreht und wendet:
diese Impfung ist eine offene Bedrohung der Gesundheit unserer
Töchter, Frauen und Mütter!
Die HPV - Impfung ist ein medizinischer/ärztlicher HOAX